Authority, Knowledge, and Normative Interpretation
Digital transformation represents a profound epistemological and pedagogical shift that fundamentally challenges established forms of religious education across diverse religious traditions. In digital environments, religious knowledge circulates beyond institutional control, mediated by algorithms, platform logics, and fragmented publics. As a result, traditional concepts of authority, authenticity, and transmission are increasingly destabilized.
Within many theological and religious contexts, these developments raise fundamental questions concerning the transformation of religious knowledge and its authorization. Classical modes of teaching, interpretation, and transmission — historically embedded in scholarly, clerical, or institutional traditions — are increasingly challenged by digitally mediated forms of immediacy, personalization, and decontextualization.
The expansion of online religious platforms and the growing presence of religious actors on social media have led to a reconfiguration of normative authority across religious communities. Practices of guidance, interpretation, and theological mediation, traditionally connected to recognized scholarly competence and institutional structures, are now partially displaced into decentralized digital arenas. In these spaces, visibility, accessibility, emotional resonance, and algorithmic amplification increasingly shape the reception and legitimacy of religious interpretations.
This transformation intensifies existing tensions between continuity and reform, tradition and innovation, institutional authority and individualized interpretation. At the same time, it raises broader questions about how theological reflection, ethical reasoning, and religious hermeneutics can be sustained under conditions of fragmented and accelerated knowledge circulation.
Religious education is therefore confronted with central tensions: between established traditions and rapidly evolving digital cultures, between communal authority and individualized belief formation, and between normative frameworks and digital pluralization. Learners are no longer merely passive recipients of religious knowledge, but active producers and negotiators of religious meaning within environments that simultaneously enable participation while also fostering superficiality, polarization, misinformation, and new forms of radicalization.
TREDT 2027 aims to critically examine these ambivalences and explore how religious education and theology can respond constructively to the challenges of digital transformation within pluralistic societies.
We invite contributions across the full range of theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical dimensions of religious knowledge in the digital age.
How decentralized participation and alternative sources of legitimacy destabilize established forms of religious authority.
Online platforms enabling competing interpretations and challenging traditional hierarchies of normative orientation.
How platform logics influence the visibility, circulation, and framing of religious content — and shape epistemic power.
How digitally mediated spaces amplify simplified and emotionally charged narratives, contributing to polarization.
New forms of religious self-representation, belonging, and the dynamics of visibility, conformity, and contestation.
Responding to changing modes of knowledge production, learner agency, and the tension between depth and immediacy.
Bias, responsibility, and the delegation of interpretive authority to artificial intelligence in religious contexts.
How educators and religious scholars redefine their roles amid digitally empowered learners and decentralized knowledge.
Uneven access to digital resources shapes participation and reinforces — or transforms — social inequalities.
Digital platforms create new spaces for exchange while fostering conflict, misunderstanding, and selective engagement.
Digitalization reconfigures authorization, accessibility, and the relationship between scholars and audiences.
Visibility shaped by platform dynamics rather than scholarly criteria — tensions between popularity and expertise.
New actors gain religious authority through digital presence, challenging classical models of scholarly formation.
How rapid-response demands pressure traditional deliberation, contextualization, and methodological rigor in legal reasoning.
Digital media often detach scriptural interpretation from scholarly and historical contexts, raising hermeneutical concerns.
Religious authority increasingly operates through performative practices, affective communication, and charismatic self-presentation within digital publics — reshaping the relationship between speaker, audience, and message.
TREDT 2027 is a joint initiative of six leading academic institutions across Europe, Africa, and Asia.
We welcome scholarly contributions across theology, religious education, sociology, digital studies, and adjacent disciplines.